The Diplomatic Peregrinations in the Holy Land of a Lacklustre Strategist

By Con George-Kotzabasis

The “lion” appointed by President Obama to the office of Secretary of Defence Leon
Panetta, who purportedly is defending America and the West from deadly foes, in
his latest visit to the Middle East is advising Israel, from his Olympian
heights, ‘to take risks for peace.’ This advice, however, is redundant,
superfluous, and otiose and Prime Minister Netanyahu has every reason to reject
and oppugn such crass “displaced” advice. Israel had already taken risks in the
past with no benefit accruing to it, least of all peace. It had withdrawn from
Gaza and re-settled its citizens within the borders of Israel with the result
that Gaza was taken over by the terrorist organization Hamas and Israel had to
defend itself from a rain of rockets fired by the militants of Hamas; and it
had likewise withdrawn from South Lebanon only for the latter to be taken over
by the other blade of the terrorist scissors Hesbollah, that also started
firing rockets against Israel forcing the latter to invade South Lebanon to
protect its citizens from being killed. Israel had taken all these risks for
peace. But what did it get in return, a deluge of rockets. What other risks
Secretary Panetta has in mind for Israel that would bring the up till now
eluding peace to the Middle East? For the Israelis to wait until Hamas and
Hesbollah load the tips of their rockets with nuclear devices supplied in the
near future by Iran? And what precautions and preventive measures the U.S. is
taking to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons?

The answer to these questions lies in the further advice that the Secretary of
Defence is giving to Israel. He tells it not to take “lone” action against Iran
in its threat to develop nuclear weapons. Preventing Iran from acquiring a
nuclear arsenal, he says, is the responsibility of major nations taking
concerted diplomatic action. But this is a “Looney” policy that the Secretary is recommending to the Israelis. It has been tried so many times in the past and it has failed resoundingly. The Islamist regime is not going to change course in its determination to possess nuclear weapons by a truckload of diplomatic carrots but only by an “armada” of bristling porcupines that will pierce its thick skin. Diplomacy can succeed with the Iranian regime only if it is accompanied by the explicit threat of arms.

Leon Panetta has the sinews of a lamb disguised under the skin of a lion. His peregrinating debut in the Holy Land and his attempt to bring, as the “envoy” of the also weak President Obama, Palestinians and Israelis to the negotiating table will prove to be an abject failure, like all the previous efforts of his predecessor Senator Mitchell, also appointed by Obama. As we have predicted, the Obama presidency is a circus of underperforming political tyros, both in the international and domestic arena and more and more Americans are realizing this and are becoming disenchanted with Obama’s performance. The “sprightly colt”, who won the race to the White House with overwhelming support only two and a half years ago, is presently underwhelmed and is conceding to be the underdog in the 2012 elections. (See Obama’s interview with George Stefanopoulos on the ABC.)

~ by kotzabasis on October 5, 2011.

One Response to “The Diplomatic Peregrinations in the Holy Land of a Lacklustre Strategist”

  1. It’s an emotive subject but I think you can pull it off…keep up the good work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: